Comey ‘broke norms but not biased’ – agency watchdog report

ComeyImage copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Mr Comey has come under fire from both Democrats and Republicans

A highly anticipated US Department of Justice report accuses ex-FBI director James Comey of being “insubordinate”, but not politically biased.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz found Mr Comey broke “dramatically from FBI and department norms” in handling a probe into Hillary Clinton’s emails.

The report also revealed Mr Comey had been using a private email account to conduct official FBI business.

The former attorney general and two FBI agents are also heavily criticised.

The inspector general’s findings examines actions by top FBI and justice department officials before the 2016 election.

He found that while Mr Comey’s actions were not the result of political bias, “by departing so clearly and dramatically from FBI and department norms, the decisions negatively impacted the perception of the FBI and the department as fair administrators of justice”.

What’s in the report?

The inspector general criticises Mr Comey and other senior officials for decisions made in the lead-up to the US election in 2016.

The 500-page report found “a troubling lack of any direct, substantive communication” between Mr Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

But the report also touched on text messages exchanged between two FBI officials who later worked on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 US election.

Peter Strzok, who was Mr Mueller’s lead agent in Russian inquiry, was having an affair with Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer who also temporarily worked on the Mueller investigation.

When Ms Page asked if Mr Trump would become president, Mr Strzok responded: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”

The report called this “not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects”.

Republicans have seized on the messages to argue the FBI investigation was biased against President Donald Trump.

The report also criticised Mr Comey’s decision to reveal publicly a week before the election that he had reopened the inquiry into Mrs Clinton’s emails – a move she partially blames for her shock defeat.

The inspector general rejects Mr Comey’s claim he was acting in the interests of transparency and faults him for “an extraordinary departure from these established norms, policies, and precedent”.

What does it say about Comey’s emails?

Potentially embarrassing for the former FBI director is the inspector general’s finding that he used a private Gmail address to conduct some official business.

This practice continued while he was investigating Mrs Clinton for using a private email account to handle government secrets – which at the time Mr Comey branded “extremely careless”.

When asked about his own email by investigators, Mr Comey said: “I had the sense that it was OK.”

He said he only handled non-confidential information on his Gmail, and it was only used for information that would become public anyway, such as speeches or public statements.

But the inspector general said it was “inconsistent” with justice department policy.

Why was there a report?

In announcing the review in January 2017, Mr Horowitz said there was overwhelming demand from lawmakers, members of the public, and “various organisations” to investigate claims of unprofessional behaviour on the part of the justice department and FBI employees.

President Donald Trump is among the most vocal critics of the FBI and the Department of Justice, repeatedly accusing several employees of being biased against him.

The report focuses on Mr Comey’s decision in July 2016, then FBI director, to hold a news conference announcing that Mrs Clinton would not be criminally charged for using a private email server for classified information during her time as US secretary of state.

Eleven days before the presidential election, Mr Comey announced that the bureau was investigating new emails related to the Clinton email probe.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Mr Comey released a book earlier this year detailing his decisions as FBI director

Mrs Clinton and her aides have blamed Mr Comey for her election loss to Mr Trump while Democrats pointed out he that remained silent at the time about an investigation into possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.

Mr Trump’s decision to fire Mr Comey in May 2017 led the Department of Justice to appoint Mr Mueller, an ex-FBI director, to open an investigation into the Russia allegations.

Mr Trump has repeatedly denied any collusion with the Kremlin, calling Russia investigation a “witch hunt”.

What’s the reaction?

On Thursday, the president took to Twitter to deny that there was any collusion and to call the allegations “phony” and “a pile of garbage”.

On Twitter and in a New York Times op-ed, Mr Comey said he had no regrets about his handling of the Clinton investigation.

Republican congressman Trey Gowdy, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said in a statement he was “angered” by the reports findings of “numerous failures”.

He said the FBI agents’ actions “destroys confidence in the impartiality of the institutions I have long served, respected, and believed in”.

Comey ‘broke norms but not biased’ – agency watchdog report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *